Comparing Naples SEO and SEO Elite Agency, starting with a file you can read yourself

Credit where it's due

SEO Elite Agency is a Naples agency, and before we compare anything, some honest credit. They work the same Collier County market we do. Their public pages market answer engine optimization and AI-related search services. Taking AI search seriously is the right instinct. When a roofer in Golden Gate or a med spa near Fifth Avenue South asks ChatGPT or Google's AI who to call, somebody's pages get read and cited. An agency that sees that coming deserves credit for it.

This page stays in one narrow lane. We say nothing about their pricing, reviews, staff, history, or client results, because we don't know those things and won't pretend to. We compare exactly one structural difference, we date it, and we show you how to verify it without trusting either of us.

The one fact this page is built on

Nearly every website publishes a plain text file called robots.txt that tells crawlers what they may and may not read. On July 10, 2026, we opened seoeliteagency.com/robots.txt. Here is what the file contained on that date:

• A Cloudflare-managed block that fully disallows a list of AI crawlers: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, CCBot, Amazonbot, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, meta-externalagent, and CloudflareBrowserRenderingCrawler.
• A content signal of ai-train=no set for all user agents, which tells AI systems not to use the site's content for training.
• And one thing beyond the file itself: when our AI research tooling tried to read their homepage while we were writing this page, the server answered HTTP 403 Forbidden, including to AI-agent user agents.

That's the whole finding. An agency that markets AEO and AI-related services had, on that date, a robots.txt telling the major AI content crawlers to stay out, and a server that turned our AI tooling away at the door. The block matches Cloudflare's managed AI-crawler blocking. Whether it was a deliberate choice is a question only they can answer, and we won't guess from the outside.

What each blocked crawler actually controls

Robots.txt directives are narrow instruments, and it's easy to make a block sound scarier than it is. So here is what each signal in that file actually does, stated as precisely as we can:

• GPTBot is OpenAI's training-content crawler. Blocking it keeps content out of OpenAI's training collection. It does not by itself control ChatGPT search, because retrieval there is handled by a different agent, OAI-SearchBot, and OAI-SearchBot is not named in their file.
• Google-Extended governs whether Google may use a site's content for Gemini training and grounding. It does not touch classic Google indexing, and it does not control eligibility for AI Overviews, which draw from Google's normal search index.
• ClaudeBot is Anthropic's crawler; blocking it keeps content out of Claude's crawl. CCBot feeds Common Crawl, a public dataset many AI systems train on.
• PerplexityBot is not named in the file, so on paper, Perplexity's live retrieval is not blocked by robots.txt.
• The HTTP 403 is a different layer entirely. Robots.txt is a polite request; a 403 is a locked door. Whatever the file says, our tooling got a hard server-level refusal when it tried to read the homepage on July 10, 2026.

Put together: the file does not block everything, and two retrieval doors, OAI-SearchBot and PerplexityBot, are open on paper. But the training and grounding crawlers for OpenAI, Anthropic, Google's Gemini, and Common Crawl are all told to stay out, and the one live test we ran hit a 403.

Risk, not verdict

Let's be careful here, because this is where comparison pages usually get dishonest. We are not claiming SEO Elite Agency ranks poorly anywhere, and we are not claiming their clients are invisible in any engine. We have no idea. Their robots.txt tells you nothing about the work they do for clients, whose sites have their own files and their own settings.

What the finding supports is one narrow statement: on their own website, the front door is closed to several of the systems they sell optimization for. That's a risk signal, not a verdict. As of mid-2026, AI assistants answer more and more "who should I call" questions by reading pages they can reach and citing sources they can quote. Content that training crawlers can't collect stays out of the models those crawlers feed. Whether that costs anything, and how much, is genuinely debatable. That an AEO vendor should have a crisp answer about it is not.

So if you're already talking to them, this becomes an interview question rather than a dealbreaker. Ask it plainly: "Your robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, and CCBot, and sets ai-train=no. Is that deliberate? If it's a content-protection choice, walk me through the reasoning. And are client sites configured differently?" There is a legitimate version of the block. Some businesses decide they don't want their content training AI models, accept the tradeoffs, and block the crawlers on purpose. That's a defensible position. An agency selling answer engine optimization should be able to articulate it on request. The quality of the answer will tell you most of what you need to know.

How we handle the same question on our own site

The fairest way to compare agencies is to look at each one's own website, because that's the one client every agency fully controls. Here's ours, all checkable today:

• Our robots.txt explicitly allows AI crawlers, including GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, PerplexityBot, and Google-Extended, verified the same day, July 10, 2026. Open naplesseo.com/robots.txt and read it.
• We publish llms.txt and llms-full.txt, the plain-text site maps proposed at llmstxt.org. No engine has committed to honoring the format, so we treat it as cheap insurance and a crawlability signal, never a ranking lever. Our guide to what llms.txt is covers it in plain English.
• We publish pricing: Local at $750 a month, Growth at $1,500, Dominate from $3,000, all month to month. AI search optimization is included in every plan, not just the top tier.
• We publish case studies from day one, baseline first, with real numbers added as they land. Our first, SWFL Media Blasters, was published on day one of the engagement, baseline first, before there were any results to brag about. We never publish invented results.

The same honesty rule applies to us as to them: we will not promise you rankings. We set a 90-day ramp expectation with every client and expect long-tail movement first. If you want to understand the work itself, start with our AI search optimization service page, and the llms.txt and AI crawlability service if the robots.txt side of this page hit home.

Who should still pick SEO Elite Agency

An honest comparison page names the cases where the other shop is the right call:

• You already work with them and it's going well. A robots.txt file is not a reason to blow up a good working relationship. It's a reason to ask one pointed question at the next check-in.
• They explain the block as a deliberate content-protection decision and show you that client sites are configured differently. That's a coherent stance, and if the rest of their answers hold up, this page's core finding stops mattering.
• You've met them, you like them, and you trust your read. Local relationships carry real weight in this market, and we'd rather you hire a Naples agency you trust than stall for months.

Check both files yourself

Don't take our word for any of this. The whole point of anchoring the page to robots.txt is that you don't need us, or them, to interpret it:

• Open seoeliteagency.com/robots.txt in any browser. Look for the Cloudflare-managed block and the list of disallowed agents.
• Open naplesseo.com/robots.txt the same way. Look for the explicit allows.
• Then check your own site. Our guide to checking whether AI can read your site walks through it in a few minutes, no technical background required.

Both snapshots carry a date, July 10, 2026, because robots.txt can change in an afternoon. If they unblock the crawlers tomorrow, genuinely good, that's the right move, and this comparison gets narrower. In the meantime, if you want to know where your own site stands with AI crawlers and classic search, request a free audit and we'll send the report within 1 business day.

Frequently asked questions